• Sign In
  • 0 items
  • Search
Welcome Guest! Please login to enable all features.



dobidanny90836e2cc6 Offline
#1 Posted : Thursday, July 18, 2013 7:40:59 PM(UTC)

Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/18/2012(UTC)
Posts: 5

Ok I had Cricut Design studio and now have CCR. I use both because when doing wording for vinyl and such, its seems much easier on CDS because the mat faces the way it will cut for the 24" boardAnd is easier to read. Am I missing something and can turn the mat picture to see it more clearly on CCR? Thanks in advance for any help you can provide
scrapalette Offline
#2 Posted : Friday, July 19, 2013 7:42:59 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Medals: Cricut Circle Member: Member of the Cricut Circle

Groups: Circle Member, Registered
Joined: 7/12/2008(UTC)
Posts: 23,858
United States
Location: FB: Cricut Lovers Guide to Design Space

Thanks: 8587 times
Was thanked: 19163 time(s) in 8570 post(s)
You cannot turn the mat in CCR. You can use the "zoom" feature to see a particular area in bigger detail or use the "out" feature to see the entire design.
MaryStillman Offline
#3 Posted : Saturday, July 20, 2013 9:03:51 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 1/30/2011(UTC)
Posts: 2,093

Thanks: 1189 times
Was thanked: 1258 time(s) in 797 post(s)
I don't cut with CCR, but do get into the web version and play with it. The orientation of the mat to computer screen orientation seems off to me also. Most people's computer screens are a long rectangle on the horizontal, not on the vertical. It would be an advantage to orientate the mat the same way. I do hate the fact you cannot see the whole mat unless it is zoomed way out.

Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2014, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.317 seconds.